Files
lynchmark/newsletter/issue002.html

42 lines
2.2 KiB
HTML
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8"><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
<title>Lynchmark Newsletter - Issue 2</title>
<style>
* { margin: 0; padding: 0; box-sizing: border-box; }
body { font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, sans-serif; line-height: 1.6; color: #111; background: #f5f5f5; padding: 20px; }
.email { max-width: 600px; margin: 0 auto; background: white; border-radius: 4px; overflow: hidden; box-shadow: 0 2px 8px rgba(0,0,0,0.08); }
.header { background: #000; color: white; padding: 28px 20px; text-align: center; }
.header h1 { font-size: 24px; font-weight: 700; margin-bottom: 4px; letter-spacing: -0.5px; }
.content { padding: 28px 24px; }
.footer { text-align: center; padding: 20px; background: #f9f9f9; border-top: 1px solid #e5e5e5; color: #666; font-size: 12px; }
.footer a { color: #000; text-decoration: none; font-weight: 500; }
.footer a:hover { text-decoration: underline; }
p { margin-bottom: 14px; color: #222; font-size: 14px; }
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div class="email">
<div class="header">
<h1>Lynchmark Newsletter</h1>
</div>
<div class="content">
<p>GPT5.2 codename Robin is out but I wouldn't trust the official benchmarks. According to Lynchmark, GPT5.2 does not outperform Gemini 3 Pro just yet.</p>
<p>Look at the full benchmark results to compare for yourself. The data shows Gemini 3 Pro still leads in coding accuracy across a range of realworld browserbased JavaScript tasks.</p>
<p>While GPT5.2 shows improvement over previous OpenAI models, it hasn't closed the gap with Google's top offering. The race is closer, but the crown hasn't changed hands.</p>
<p>Don't take marketing claims at face value—check the numbers. Lynchmark runs automated, reproducible tests that measure actual implementation ability, not just theoretical performance.</p>
</div>
<div class="footer">
<p>You can reply to this but I can't respond.</p>
<p><a href="https://lynchmark.com">View full benchmark results</a> | <a href="https://lynchmark.com/unsubscribe">Unsubscribe</a></p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>