From f87f34e95bc05411f346edafb3721b84694571bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: multipleof4 Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 09:47:45 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] Refactor: Simplify to minimal black theme with new copy --- newsletter/issue001.html | 262 ++++++--------------------------------- 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 225 deletions(-) diff --git a/newsletter/issue001.html b/newsletter/issue001.html index cedd983..9bb092a 100644 --- a/newsletter/issue001.html +++ b/newsletter/issue001.html @@ -1,264 +1,76 @@ - + + Lynchmark Newsletter - Issue 1
-
-

Lynchmark Newsletter

-
+

Lynchmark Newsletter

-
-

gpt‑5.1‑codex‑max just got added to API after having been added to Codex 2 weeks ago.

- -
-
-
M
-
-
GPT‑5.1‑Codex‑Max
-
Just released to API
-
-
-
8/11 C‑
-
- -
versus
- -
-
-
C
-
-
GPT‑5.1‑Codex
-
Previous version
-
-
-
7/11 D
-
- -
-

The Takeaway

-

Max scores one point better than regular Codex. That's something. But it's still worse than Gemini 3 Pro, Claude Opus 4.5, and DeepSeek v3.2. It's only on par with Claude Sonnet 4.5.

-
- -
- The reality check: Even with this release, OpenAI is still far behind. This shows exactly why they declared "code red." The gap is real. They're not closing it fast enough. -
- -

What's coming: The rumors say OpenAI's upcoming model (codenamed "Garlic") arrives next week. The pressure is on. The anticipation is building. I'll benchmark it the moment it drops.

- -

— Lynchmark

-
+

gpt‑5.1‑codex‑max was just added to API after having been introduced in Codex only 2 weeks ago. I just benchmarked it and it scored better than gpt‑5.1‑codex.

+ +

Codex alone scores 7/11 D but Max scores 8/11 C‑.

+ +

Still worse than Gemini 3 Pro and Claude Opus 4.5 and DeepSeek v3.2 but on par with Claude Sonnet 4.5.

+ +

This shows even with this release, how far behind OpenAI is and why they 'declared code red'. The rumors of the upcoming model by OpenAI codenamed Garlic next week is very anticipated now.

+ +

— Lynchmark