LLM Benchmark Analysis 2024
++ 231 automated tests reveal clear performance tiers, surprising failures, and critical insights for production use. +
+Executive Summary
+Overall Performance Ranking
+Critical Failure Analysis
++ Scrypt Hash Test: 4 models failed due to incorrect library imports or parameter handling.
+The CDN Import Challenge
++ The scrypt test proved particularly challenging, with only 4 of 8 models passing. The failures reveal a critical gap in LLM knowledge: correct library import paths for browser environments. +
+Library-Specific Knowledge +
+ Models that used cdn.skypack.dev or incorrect version paths consistently failed.
+
Performance Insights
+Key Findings
++ For production-grade code generation: Claude Opus 4.5 at TEMP 0.7 remains the most reliable choice across diverse coding challenges.
+