From 2d29cd6d1ee66f9f3a3cd3c1f4b4ddcc96168ef4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: multipleof4 Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2025 12:08:45 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] Refactor: Add inline image to issue 003 --- newsletter/issue003.html | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/newsletter/issue003.html b/newsletter/issue003.html index 1e60923..5d86e8b 100644 --- a/newsletter/issue003.html +++ b/newsletter/issue003.html @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ .footer a{color:#000;text-decoration:none;font-weight:500} .footer a:hover{text-decoration:underline} p{margin-bottom:14px;color:#222;font-size:14px} + img{max-width:100%;height:auto;display:block;margin-top:20px;border-radius:2px} @@ -23,6 +24,7 @@

Lynchmark verifies that gemini-3-flash-preview matches gemini-3-pro-preview in JS coding abilities, but specifically at Temperature 0.35.

Our findings support that both Pro and Flash deliver significantly more accurate results at 0.35. While this was previously established for Pro, we recently ran the same benchmark comparing the recommended Temperature 1.0 against 0.35.

The data shows a clear score difference once again. You can see the performance gap for yourself on the results page.

+ Benchmark Comparison

You can reply to this but I can't respond.