chore(build): update dist

dist/my-theory-of-everything/index.html

@@ -95,7 +95,6 @@
 <p><img src="https://direct-img.link/cosmic+void+darkness+meets+glowing+matter+split" alt="Void and matter side by side"></p>
 <p>Reality must meet <em>all</em> conditions. Not some conditions. Not the conditions we find comfortable. All of them. And &quot;nothing exists&quot; is one of the conditions. So the totality contains both: matter and nothing, being and non-being, 1 and 0 — existing alongside each other, at all times, in every way.</p>
 <p>This is the move most people can&#39;t make, and it&#39;s the reason the question feels impossible. We assume it&#39;s <em>either</em> 0 <em>or</em> 1. Either something exists or nothing does. But that&#39;s a false fork. It can be — and is — that <strong>0 and 1 are true at the same time.</strong></p>
-<p>And here&#39;s the mechanism that makes it coherent rather than contradictory: nothingness is not the <em>absence</em> of everything. Nothingness is the <em>sum</em> of everything. If every possible configuration exists with equal weight, then nothing is selected — and a totality in which nothing is selected is, viewed from outside, indistinguishable from nothing at all. A library containing every possible book contains no information. Perfect superposition sums to null.</p>
 <p><img src="https://direct-img.link/infinite+library+endless+bookshelves+surreal+cosmic" alt="Infinite library of all possible books"></p>
 <p>So existence and nonexistence aren&#39;t competing answers to the two questions. They&#39;re the same fact described from two vantages. From outside the totality: zero. From inside any part of it: everything. The two questions resolve into one object, seen twice.</p>
 <p>It follows that reality is infinite. But — and this matters — <strong>within the infiniteness, linear time also exists.</strong> Infinity is not the negation of sequence. It&#39;s the container of every sequence.</p>