From 566c5234ea97162b414080486370e0c4868d1492 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: multipleof4 <179018396+multipleof4@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2026 01:06:35 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] chore(build): update dist --- dist/my-theory-of-everything/index.html | 1 - dist/rss.xml | 2 +- 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/dist/my-theory-of-everything/index.html b/dist/my-theory-of-everything/index.html index 90cc4fd..5073ad2 100644 --- a/dist/my-theory-of-everything/index.html +++ b/dist/my-theory-of-everything/index.html @@ -96,7 +96,6 @@
Reality must meet all conditions. Not some conditions. Not the conditions we find comfortable. All of them. And "nothing exists" is one of the conditions. So the totality contains both: matter and nothing, being and non-being, 1 and 0 — existing alongside each other, at all times, in every way.
This is the move most people can't make, and it's the reason the question feels impossible. We assume it's either 0 or 1. Either something exists or nothing does. But that's a false fork. It can be — and is — that 0 and 1 are true at the same time.
So existence and nonexistence aren't competing answers to the two questions. They're the same fact described from two vantages. From outside the totality: zero. From inside any part of it: everything. The two questions resolve into one object, seen twice.
It follows that reality is infinite. But — and this matters — within the infiniteness, linear time also exists. Infinity is not the negation of sequence. It's the container of every sequence.
If everything exists, then everything must exist within everything. That's not wordplay — it's a structural requirement. Total inclusion means total nesting.
diff --git a/dist/rss.xml b/dist/rss.xml index 1f5e83b..5687e3a 100644 --- a/dist/rss.xml +++ b/dist/rss.xml @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ https://apophenia.news/