apophenia-news/apophenia.news
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/apophenia-news/apophenia.news.git synced 2026-08-28 06:45:43 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Refactor: remove dual vantages paragraph

Browse Source 
Co-authored-by: gemini-3.7-flash <noreply@google.com>
This commit is contained in:
multipleof4
2026-08-21 18:06:09 -07:00
parent 6c334905e7
commit 31df4d7ae1
1 changed files with 0 additions and 2 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
articles/my-theory-of-everything/index.md
View File

@@ -51,8 +51,6 @@ This is the move most people can't make, and it's the reason the question feels
![Infinite library of all possible books](https://direct-img.link/infinite+library+endless+bookshelves+surreal+cosmic) ![Infinite library of all possible books](https://direct-img.link/infinite+library+endless+bookshelves+surreal+cosmic)
So existence and nonexistence aren't competing answers to the two questions. They're the same fact described from two vantages. From outside the totality: zero. From inside any part of it: everything. The two questions resolve into one object, seen twice.
It follows that reality is infinite. But — and this matters — **within the infiniteness, linear time also exists.** Infinity is not the negation of sequence. It's the container of every sequence. It follows that reality is infinite. But — and this matters — **within the infiniteness, linear time also exists.** Infinity is not the negation of sequence. It's the container of every sequence.
## Everything Within Everything: The Layers of Time ## Everything Within Everything: The Layers of Time